SNF Staffing Benchmarks

Executive Summary

The strongest-performing SNFs consistently balance three workforce levers: staffing levels, overtime, and agency use. This report identifies the benchmarks associated with stronger clinical outcomes, lower labor costs, and better workforce stability.

National staffing benchmarks are based on CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data from more than 13,000 skilled nursing facilities across Q2–Q4 2025. Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs) are excluded.

Metric Operational target Quality differentiation Ceiling signal National avg
Total adjusted nurse HPRD 3.75 – 4.5 hrs 4.5 – 5.5 hrs > 5.5 hrs 3.86 hrs
Adjusted RN HPRD 0.65 – 0.80 hrs 0.80 – 1.00 hrs ≥ 1.00 hr 0.66 hrs
Overtime % 3 – 7.5% < 3% > 10% sustained 8.9%
Agency / contract % < 5% < 1% > 10% ongoing 5.7%
Total nurse turnover < 50% < 40% > 50% 46.6%

Source: CMS PBJ Q2–Q4 2025, n = 13,098 SNFs. CCRCs excluded.

SNF Labor Patterns — Covr Intelligence
SNF Labor Intelligence

The Four Labor Patterns

Q2–Q4 2025 · 13,098 SNFs · CCRCs excluded

Facilities generally fall into one of four labor patterns based on their overtime and agency use. Comparing these patterns to CMS claims data and MDS quality measures reveals clear differences in star ratings, turnover, and regulatory outcomes.

← Low Overtime  ·  High Overtime →
Low Agency
Self-Sufficient ✅
OT < 7.5% · Agency < 5%
33%of SNFs
3.35★Avg rating
41.9%Turnover
Burning Staff ⚠️
OT ≥ 7.5% · Agency < 5%
39%of SNFs
2.79★Avg rating
45.9%Turnover
High Agency
Agency-Dependent
OT < 7.5% · Agency ≥ 5%
11%of SNFs
2.89★Avg rating
51.8%Turnover
Dual Pressure ❌
OT ≥ 7.5% · Agency ≥ 5%
18%of SNFs
2.50★Avg rating
53.5%Turnover
Where does your facility stand?
Your Overtime % 8.9%
0%Natl avg: 8.9%25%
Your Agency % 5.7%
0%Natl avg: 5.7%30%
Dual Pressure ❌
Both levers are stressed simultaneously. Address base staffing depth first, then reduce agency, then target overtime.
2.50★
Avg CMS rating
24.7%
4–5★ rate
53.5%
Avg turnover
$48,211
Avg annual fines
Avg 4–5★ Rate
Self-Suff
49.4%
Agency-Dep
36.4%
Burning
33.3%
Dual Pres
24.7%
Avg Annual Fines
Self-Suff
$22K
Agency-Dep
$31K
Burning
$36K
Dual Pres
$48K
Avg Nurse Turnover
Self-Suff
41.9%
Agency-Dep
51.8%
Burning
45.9%
Dual Pres
53.5%
Source: CMS PBJ Q2–Q4 2025, CMS Provider Info & MDS QMs May 2026 · SNF-only · CCRCs excluded · n = 13,098 facilities
OT Benchmark Tool — Covr
SNF Overtime Benchmark

Where does your facility rank?

See how your facility compares to national percentiles

Your facility OT %
%
National average: 8.9%
P10 · 4.2% Mean · 8.9% P90 · 13.1%
Potential Annual Savings
Unnecessary Hours / Week
Avoidable OT Premium
Callout coverage optimized to regular-rate staff
Total Estimated Savings
Unnecessary hours + avoidable OT premium
Unnecessary hours (30%) reflect labor hours that are fully avoidable by reducing overscheduling, missed lunch breaks, and early/late clockouts. Avoidable OT premium (70%) reflects shifts filled by regular-rate staff instead of overtime staff.
Top Performers
≤ 5.8%
Strong scheduling discipline. Self-Sufficient or Agency-Dependent labor pattern likely.
Average
5.8% – 10.6%
Room for improvement. Turnover risk begins to rise above 7.5% OT.
High Risk
> 10.6%
Burning Staff or Dual Pressure pattern. Workforce plan required.
Percentile OT % Interpretation
P10 — Top 10%4.2% Excellent
P25 — Top Quartile5.8% Strong
P50 — Median8.1% Average
Mean8.9% National avg
P75 — Bottom Quartile10.6% Elevated risk
P9013.1% High risk
P9515.0% Crisis level
SNF Agency Benchmark

What is your agency dependency costing you?

Enter your agency staffing percentage to see where you rank nationally and estimate the savings from building an internal float pool. Based on Q2–Q4 2025 PBJ data across 13,098 facilities.

Your facility agency %
%
National average: 5.7%
P50 · 0.5% Mean · 5.7% P90 · 18.5%
Float Pool Savings Potential
Agency hours replaced / week
Rate differential / hour
$15.00
Agency $52/hr vs float pool $37/hr
Annual savings potential
Agency bill rate: $52/hr. Float pool all-in rate: $37/hr. Rate differential: $15/hr. Assumes agency hours reduced to quartile target are fully replaced by an internal float pool. Based on national avg facility (87.5 residents, 3.86 HPRD). Actual savings vary by market, census, and contract terms.
Self-Sufficient
≤ 0.5%
Minimal or no agency use. Workforce is internally stable.
Moderate Dependency
0.5% – 7.0%
Strategic agency use. Monitor for contractor-turnover cycle above 5%.
High Dependency
> 7.0%
Elevated turnover risk. Float pool or workforce stabilization plan recommended.
Percentile Agency % Interpretation
P10 – P250.0% Zero agency
P50 — Median0.5% Minimal agency
Mean5.7% National avg
P757.0% Moderate dependency
P9018.5% High dependency
P9527.4% Structural dependency
Above P95> 27.4% Crisis level
SNF Labor Pattern Map — Covr Intelligence
SNF State Benchmarks

SNF Labor Pattern by State

Q2–Q4 2025 · CCRCs excluded
Self-Sufficient
Agency-Dependent
Burning Staff
Split
Mixed
Dual Pressure
RN✓ states

Click any state
to see its labor profile

Overtime & Agency
OT Avg
%
Natl: 8.9%
OT P25/P75
Agency Avg
%
Natl: 5.7%
Staffing & Outcomes
HPRD
Natl: 3.86
RN HPRD
Natl: 0.66
Turnover
%
Natl: 46.6%
Rehospitalization
%
Natl: 23.9%
Falls w/ Injury
%
Natl: 3.18%
State Pattern OT % P25 P75 Agency% HPRD RN HPRD Turnover Rehosp Falls
Source: OT — CMS PBJ Overtime Files Q2–Q4 2025, hours-weighted · Agency — CMS PBJ Daily Nurse Staffing Q2–Q4 2025 · HPRD & turnover — CMS Provider Info May 2026 · Rehospitalization — CMS Quality Measures Claims May 2026 (4-quarter adjusted rate, Measure 521) · Falls — CMS Quality Measures MDS May 2026 (4-quarter average, Measure 410) · SNF-only · CCRCs excluded
Staffing Data Insights — Covr

PBJ Staffing Data · Findings

What high-performing facilities do differently.

Six insights from national PBJ data and frontline workforce surveys that highlight the staffing decisions most closely tied to quality, retention, and financial performance.

Agency use is highly skewed.

Labor Analysis
Average
5.7%
Median
0.5%

Most facilities use little to no agency labor. A small group of high-agency facilities drives the national average more than 10x above the median.

0% 10% 20% 30% median average

RN coverage is the strongest predictor of rehospitalization.

Clinical Outcome

Facilities below 0.65 RN hours per resident day consistently experience higher rehospitalization rates.

0.65 HPRD Rehospitalization Rate High RN Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD) Low High National average

Overtime predicts turnover.

Labor Analysis

Below 7% overtime, every 1-point reduction in OT is associated with a 1–2 point reduction in turnover.

Turnover Overtime ↓ (below 7%) −1% −1% −1%

Schedule flexibility ranks ahead of pay as a retention driver.

Frontline survey
45%
of frontline workers say schedule flexibility, control, or advance notice is the primary reason they stay at a facility.
45% Schedule control All other reasons combined

Falls are driven by workforce stability, not staffing volume.

Clinical outcome

Facilities with the highest turnover average 3.44% falls with major injury, compared to 2.96% for the lowest-turnover facilities.

Lowest-turnover facilities 2.96% Highest-turnover facilities 3.44% Falls with major injury rate, lowest vs. highest turnover quartile

Open shifts are a communication problem.

Frontline survey

Thirty-four percent of workers say waiting for a scheduler response is their biggest frustration. Another 33% say they learn about open shifts too late to pick them up.

Waiting on scheduler response 34% Learn about shifts too late 33% Share of workers citing each as their top scheduling frustration

Source: PBJ staffing data and frontline workforce survey responses, analyzed by Covr. CMS Provider Info and Quality Measures May 2026. Figures represent national patterns across long-term care facilities, not a guarantee for any individual facility.

Ready to put
insight into action?

See why thousands of long-term care facilities trust Covr.